![]() angrily deployed retaliatory bombers, to bipartisan acclaim. Or to take a far more gruesome case: When the Syrian government last used poison gas, killing roughly a hundred people, the U.S. But if the tabloids ran a negative profile on the Asexual Boss from Hell, the public wouldn’t get very mad and Hollywood almost certainly wouldn’t ostracize the offender I daresay the average employee would far prefer to work for a boss who occasionally pressured them for a date. But the abuse is never sexual (or ethnic) the celebrity limits himself to attacking subordinates’ intelligence, character, pride, and hope for the future. He threatens to fire them out of sheer sadistic pleasure. He calls them the cruelest names he can devise. Suppose, for example, that a major celebrity is extremely emotionally abusive to all his subordinates. Why does this confuse me? Because many celebrities do many comparably bad things other than sexual harassment, and virtually no one cares. Each new expose leads to public outrage and professional ostracism. People all over the country – indeed, the world – have recently discovered that many celebrities are habitual sexual harassers. Last year, Bryan Caplan wrote about what he called The Unbearable Arbitrariness Of Deploring:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |